-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 357
[Extensions.Enrichment] Rename some AddTraceEnricher methods to TryAddTraceEnricher #3085
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Extensions.Enrichment] Rename some AddTraceEnricher methods to TryAddTraceEnricher #3085
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3085 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.60% 69.80% +0.19%
==========================================
Files 420 410 -10
Lines 16317 16199 -118
==========================================
- Hits 11358 11308 -50
+ Misses 4959 4891 -68
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
bfcb200 to
9418308
Compare
9418308 to
c7344d1
Compare
dariusclay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, better naming to match underlying behavior
Co-authored-by: Piotr Kiełkowicz <[email protected]>
Changes
Renamed some extension methods from
AddTraceEnricher*toTryAddTraceEnricher*to better convey the idea of idempotency -duplicate registrations are not allowed nor make sense.Merge requirement checklist
CHANGELOG.mdfiles updated for non-trivial changes